Nollywood actress Lizzy Anjorin has hit back at actress and influencer Priscilla Ojo following reports of a court order allegedly obtained against her, insisting that the legal action will not intimidate her.
Lizzy made her position known during an Instagram Live session, where she questioned the circumstances surrounding the reported court process and criticised the decision to circulate legal documents on social media.
The controversy is the latest development in an increasingly public dispute involving Lizzy, Priscilla and Priscilla’s mother, actress Iyabo Ojo, which has continued to generate reactions online.
According to reports, the alleged interim order restricts Lizzy from publishing certain content connected to the dispute. However, Lizzy appeared undeterred, reportedly continuing to use her social media platforms while challenging the circumstances surrounding the order.
During her live session, she argued that publicising a court document before it is formally served on the person concerned raises questions about the process.
“Your case na dead on arrival. If you post court letter on any platform before serving person wey you wan go serve, that court case na fake court case,” Lizzy said.
She also pushed back against claims or suggestions linking her to any alleged imprisonment of Priscilla.
“I don’t want to hear that, Lizzy Anjorin locked Priscilla in prison oh,” she stated.
Lizzy further questioned why an alleged petition connected to the dispute would be shared publicly online, suggesting that the development had become more of a social-media battle than a courtroom matter.
“They have petitioned us oh. Gistlover don run go petition Lizzy oh. They are no longer going to court, oh. If nor be madness, posting petition letter on social media,” she said.
Her comments have added fresh fuel to the already heated celebrity dispute, with social media users closely following the latest exchanges between the personalities involved.
While Lizzy has publicly challenged the reported court action, the precise legal status and implications of the alleged order remain matters for the courts and the parties’ legal representatives to clarify.
For now, the dispute appears far from settled, as the social-media exchanges continue to keep the matter in the public spotlight.
About The Author
